“legal” NAME is fictional

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Sur name

Sur. Fr. On; upon; over. In the titles of real actions “sur” was used to point out what the writ was founded upon. Blacks Law Dictionary, 1891, 1st Ed., page 1141. This use of sur-names on birth certificates, coupled with you answering to “your NAME” as an “idem sonans” in a courtroom allows them, via a traverse, to deprive you of property and freedom (via your BC, their Commercial Charter).

Following from NW, 1828 Dictionary.

SUR, a prefex. From the French, contracted from L. super, supra, signifies over, above, beyond, upon.

Surname. The family name; the name over and above the Christian name. The part of the name which is not given in babtism; the name common to all members of a family. Blacks Law Dictionary, 1891, pg. 1143. Surnames equate to coat of arms (a surcoat), gentile, pagan, heathen, unbelievers, something added to, and dead in law, per the speaker on “Christian Man Named Dan PART 1. In a court of law (sic) if/when you agree or state a last/surname you have rejected Christ. Also, see/hear: “Christian Identity 3”, (video no longer available). Surnames; with us, originally designated occupation, ESTATE, place of RESIDENCE, or some particular thing or event that related to the PERSON.” Caps are added emphasis.

Surnamed, pp. Called by a name “added to” the Christian or ORIGINAL name.

Surnaming, ppr. Naming by an appellation added to the original name.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment


When a man’s given name\s are ‘capitalized’ upon, first letter capitalized only, it denotes an indentured serf, while all caps denotes a ‘thing’ or fiction.  All lowercase denotes fully free living man.

Note, technically the “legal last” was originally created by Domesday Book and concept of “country” or “nation” came out of the 100 Years War, originally all focused on clan and kin or their own blood line acknowledging the living without fiction government.

Further Study







Domesday Book



100 Years War




Posted in Man | Leave a comment

What is in a “name” – alfred ADASK

alfred ADASK, partial ‘post’ –

… According to Strong’s Concordance, the Greek word for “name” used in in every one of the previous six verses is coded and defined as:

From a presumed derivative of the base of G1097 (compare G3685); a “name” (literally or figuratively), (authority, character): – called, (+ sur-) name (-d).

Thus, the Greek word G3686 doesn’t necessarily mean “name” in the sense of “Laura,” “Nathan,” “Alexandra” and “Jesus”. If can also mean “authority”. For example, in the following two verses, the Greek word translated into English as “name” actually means “authority“.

1 Corinthians 6:11—“ And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.”

Acts 2:38—“ Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

Imagine an old costume drama about King Arthur’s Round Table. Imagine a relatively insignificant knight coming into a king’s court. Normally, that insignificant knight would not dare to speak in the court unless spoken to. But in this case, our insignificant knight boldly announces, “I come in the name of Prince John!” Our relatively insignificant knight does not mean that he’s impersonating Prince John. He means that he “comes in the authority of Prince John”. In other words, Prince John ordered the knight to convey a message to the king’s court. Because the insignificant knight speaks in the greater authority of Price John, he will be heard and respected.

The example of an insignificant knight speaking “in the name” (actually, in the”authority“) of a more powerful prince is analogous to that of relatively insignificant beings like you or I praying, being justified or being baptized in the name of “Jesus”. You and I might not be heard or respected in our own authority, but if we are allowed to speak, pray, justify or be baptized and be heard and respected so long as we act “in the name” (actually, in the “authority“) of a more powerful being.

source – http://adask.wordpress.com/2014/04/17/is-the-king-james-or-any-other-version-of-the-bible-perfect

cynthia note – “sur” is not a “name” but technically a WORD that by country of origin definition is typically a trade or profession, name of a place or geographic\topographic description.  In some instances it is in honor to a son’s father’s given name i.e. davidson = david’s son, or angelic or mythos i.e. Michael for the angel Michael, not as common.  However, separately and in addition it is synonymous “legaly” as being a form of ‘slave’ or “property” to ‘government’ because it denotes acknowledgement to an ancient “poll” or head tax reinforced by earlier king of England who created the term “sur name” when in fact it is a WORD and not a ‘name’.  Think of “bounty hunter” “wanted dead or alive” – monsters, beasts, and animals can be treated as such, but technically living man is said to be immune from such genocide, murder, et al.  So, do you acknowledge the “last WORD” in any capacity as “my name” or “that is me”?  Or do you instead not only self=-educate but also deny with explanation to educate others regarding “legal last name” is technically in fact not a ‘name’ but a WORD by its definition and or historical context separaate from use of capitus?

Posted in Man | 1 Comment

“legal last” is self incriminating

If the definition of your “legal last” is a ‘profession’ or ‘trade’ seriously consider –

pro means ‘for’ and ‘fess’ means –

merriam-webster dictionary online

reference dictionary online

the free dictionary online

Posted in Man | Leave a comment

Term “person”

Very important reading


Posted in Person | Leave a comment

Sur name research

A resource to research you sur name\s

Behind the Name

Posted in Man, Person | Leave a comment